Colorado has dozens of viable STR markets, but Granby/Grand Lake and Estes Park represent two distinct investment profiles that we get asked about constantly. Both are strong markets. But they serve different investors with different goals.
Granby & Grand Lake: Year-Round Revenue
Granby benefits from four distinct revenue seasons: ski season at Granby Ranch and SolVista, summer fishing and lake activities at Grand Lake, fall foliage, and the shoulder seasons that still generate solid mid-week bookings. Revenue for well-positioned properties runs $25,000–$85,000+ annually, with the upper end going to lakefront and ski-in/ski-out inventory.
Estes Park: High Peaks, High Risk
Estes Park commands premium rates due to Rocky Mountain National Park access, but the market is heavily weighted toward summer and fall. Winter occupancy drops significantly compared to Granby. Properties near downtown or with mountain views can achieve $35,000–$120,000+, but owners need to model the seasonal volatility carefully.
The Regulatory Picture
Both markets have active STR licensing requirements. Granby has been relatively stable. Estes Park, like many gateway communities near national parks, has seen ongoing policy discussions that could affect short-term rental availability. We stay current on both and handle compliance for all properties we manage.
Which Is Right for You?
If you want steady year-round revenue and lower regulatory risk, Granby/Grand Lake is the stronger choice for most investors. If you already own in Estes Park or are drawn to the RMNP proximity, it can absolutely perform — it just requires tighter seasonality planning. We provide free market projections for both before you commit to anything.
Get a Free Revenue Estimate
See what your Colorado property could earn with McAdams management.
Get My EstimateHave a question about this topic?
Ask Us